Have you ever wondered why things keep going wrong in your business, despite your best efforts?
It could be because you're not getting to the root of the problem.
Just like a tree can't grow well if its roots are damaged, a business can't thrive if its underlying issues aren't fixed.
In this article, we will cover 9 specific root cause analysis techniques tailored for safety managers seeking to improve workplace safety.
For each technique, the guide explains what it is, steps for how to implement it, and an example scenario related to safety.
The techniques this article covers include:
But, let’s first understand in your workplace management and safety procedures, what is the importance of root cause analysis!
Root cause analysis (RCA) is a process used to find the underlying causes of an incident, error, or problem.
It helps you get to the core of a problem. Instead of just addressing the obvious symptoms, you keep asking "Why?" to identify the root cause.
This allows you to implement solutions that target the source of the problem, not just the surface issues.
Some examples of when to perform a reactive root cause analysis:
Conducting a root cause analysis soon after an incident provides the most accurate information before details are forgotten.
Also, Check Out the OSHA Injury Report Flowchart & How To Make It For Workspace Safety
The 5 Whys technique involves repeatedly asking "Why?" to drill down to the root cause of an issue.
By asking "WHY?" [five times], you can peel back the layers of symptoms to get to the source of the problem. It's an easy and effective form of root cause analysis methods.
Example Scenario of workplace and implementing 5 WHY technique:
An employee was injured when a heavy box fell on them while unloading inventory.
Q1 - Why was the employee injured? Because a heavy box fell on them.
Q2 - Why did the box fall? Because it was unstable on the shelf.
Q3 - Why was the box unstable? Because it was stacked incorrectly.
Q4 - Why was it stacked incorrectly? Because the employee did not follow proper stacking procedures.
Q5 - Why didn't the employee follow procedures? Because they had not been properly trained in safe stacking methods.
By using the 5 Whys, you identified lack of training as the root cause of the injury.
The solution would be to provide proper training on safe stacking procedures.
If you want to find possible reasons for a problem or issue, you can use a Fishbone Diagram, which is also called an Ishikawa Diagram. There is a horizontal "spine" that leads to diagonal "bones" that branch off and represent different types of reasons. This is how the diagram got its name.
For more clarity on all possible root causes, see Fishbone Diagrams.
Steps to Create:
After completing the diagram, identify patterns in the information and determine which parts need improvement.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a systematic technique for identifying potential failures in designs, processes, and services before they reach the customer.
It aims to prevent failures by examining how failures could occur and what effects they would have.
Steps to Implement FMEA
Here’s an example template of FEMA
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a type of logical failure analysis that tries to figure out why something bad happened, which is called the "top event."
It gives you an organized and visual way to look at the ways that a system can lead to this top event.
For example, the fault tree shows the possible paths in a system that can lead to a bad result. This lets safety team figure out where stronger barriers or controls for prevention might be needed.
Steps to Create
To conduct a Fault Tree Analysis:
Example Scenario of Fault Tree Analysis in a Workplace
A fault tree could examine a top event such as “Worker injury from a robotic arm on the assembly line.” Possible primary causes may be “Robotic arm hits worker” and “Worker within range of the arm.”
Another secondary cause for “Worker within range of arm” could be “Worker enters area without authorization”. The fault tree would continue from there, tracing back all the possible causes that may result in the worker getting injured by the robotic arm.
This mapping can show weaknesses in safety barriers, training, equipment maintenance, alarms, and other key areas.
The idea is to reduce the probability that the undesired top event will occur by reducing the probability of those faults further down the tree.
The Pareto principle, also known as the 80/20 rule, is the observation that 80% of outcomes are the result of 20% of causes.
When applied to workplace safety root cause analysis, Pareto Analysis helps identify the most significant contributing factors to safety incidents.
This Analysis involves categorizing the various causes of safety incidents and determining the frequency of occurrence. This makes it easy to visualize the significant contributors.
Steps to Implement
Follow these steps to conduct Pareto Analysis for workplace safety:
Example Scenario
A Construction site reviewed its safety incident data and created a Pareto chart. They found that slips, trips, and falls accounted for 70% of all incidents. Electrical hazards and struck-by incidents accounted for 20%. The remaining 10% were other minor incident types.
By focusing their safety resources on reducing slips, trips and falls - the vital few causes - the Construction site could make the biggest impact in improving workplace safety.
Electrical and struck-by hazards were still addressed but to a lesser degree.
Bowtie Analysis is a risk management technique that visually maps the processes leading up to a risk occurrence (the “knot”) and its consequences. When causes and effects are placed on either side of the core risk event, the diagram forms a bowtie.
Bowtie Analysis shows all risk variables. This identifies crucial control points to prevent and mitigate incidents.
Bowtie Analysis helps safety teams identify causes and create worst-case scenarios for workplace events.
Steps to Create
To create a Bowtie Diagram for analyzing risk:
Example Scenario
A manufacturing facility wants to analyze the potential risk event of a hazardous chemical spill. They create a Bowtie Diagram with "chemical spill" as the knot.
On the left side, they identify causes such as corrosion of chemical storage tanks, employee errors in handling, and equipment failures. On the right side, they map out consequences like toxic fumes, contamination of surrounding areas, injuries to workers, and environmental damage.
Existing controls like protective equipment and spill response protocols are added. The analysis highlights the need for additional inspection and monitoring of chemical tanks as a critical control point.
This Bowtie Analysis provides a detailed risk management plan.
The 8D Problem Solving technique is a structured team-based approach for identifying, correcting, and eliminating recurring problems.
The "8D" refers to the eight disciplines or methodical steps required to address problems in a systematic way.
8D focuses on preventing problems from reoccurring rather than just implementing a quick fix. It brings together team members from different departments and functions to provide diverse insights into finding the root cause.
Example Scenario & Implementation of 8D Problem Solving
An employee was injured when a heavy load fell on them from unsafe storage on a high shelf.
An 8D team could be formed to analyze this incident.
Root cause mapping is a visual diagram that depicts the relationship between a problem or defect and its underlying causal factors.
It provides a clear picture of how various elements link together to produce the undesirable effect.
Steps to Create to create a root cause map:
Example Scenario
A worker slips and falls on a wet floor near the building entrance. To analyze the incident, a root cause map is created.
The fall is listed as the problem.
Contributing factors such as weather, floor condition, footwear, distraction, and lighting are explored through sub-branches.
This reveals root issues like inadequate mats, poor drainage, lack of safety rules, etc. Solutions can then target those specifics.
Change Analysis is a root cause analysis technique that involves comparing a situation before and after a change occurs. The goal is to identify the root causes of the change in results or outcomes.
Steps to Conduct Change Analysis for Root Cause Identification:
Example Scenario
A manufacturing facility recently upgraded a piece of equipment from a manual to automated model. Since the change, there has been an increase in product defects.
To find the root cause, Change Analysis is used to compare metrics before and after the equipment upgrade:
By analyzing the data changes, two potential root causes are identified:
Additional investigation would determine which is the primary root cause to address.
SafetyIQ works as a root cause analysis software that gathers all the important details about workplace incidents in one place, making it easy to see patterns and find the root causes of problems.
For example, if there are a lot of slips and falls in a certain area, SafetyIQ can help managers to identify hazards (what’s causing them) - maybe the floor is too slippery or there’s not enough lighting.
Once the cause is found, businesses can take action to fix it and prevent it from happening again.
A real-life example of how SafetyIQ works is with a company called PALFINGER. They used SafetyIQ and managed to save almost a million dollars in worker compensation costs over two years. This happened because they could find and fix the problems that were causing injuries at work
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CHECK OUT OUR RESOURCES!
We cover a range of topics in our articles - view all blogs.
Copyright © 2024 SafetyIQ Pty Ltd. All Rights Reserved.